17 Comments

They're just so afraid of their own shadows...smoke screen everything. Now at last someone has pulled the screen off so that the public can see these self righteous ministers being exposed to their own doings..ie Ridout saga.

Expand full comment

They're just so afraid of their own shadows...smoke screen everything. Now at last someone has pulled the screen off so that the public can see these self righteous ministers being exposed to their own doings..ie Ridout saga.

Expand full comment

Finally a foreign media unwilling to stoop so low to a nepotism state that is ruled by draconian dictatorahip.. They can block Asia Sentinel but forgot there is VPN.

Expand full comment

Nothing surprises me.

I was said to have acted with malice when I stood up and told my truth, after a financial incentive had been offered which would cover up allegations of fraud which implicated a well-connected Singapore elite. I have nothing to hide.

https://www.asiasentinel.com/p/australian-woman-fight-prove-singapore-fraud

Expand full comment

I’m using SurfShark and it’s all fine and dandy.

Expand full comment

Hmm I wonder, what if you had shared the substack page (domain) instead of your own domain? IMDA won’t be able to block substack eh? Since they’re also used for a ton of other publications.

Expand full comment

The Singapore elite are showing their weakness and fear... Good! :-)

Expand full comment

From Singapore to support you!

Expand full comment
Jun 3, 2023·edited Jun 3, 2023

Q: What right do British and American journalists have to impose their world view on Asia? A: None whatsover because they are the entitled elephant in the room, with the absolute worst history of genocide, race murder and barbarism for the last 400 years. Clean up your own backyard first.

Expand full comment

with VPN, banning of website is just a symbolic move without any real effect

Expand full comment

I'm from Singapore. I cannot access your website. Funnily enough, I can access it via substack. Jokes on the PAP

Expand full comment

This is not a novel move by the Singapore one-party dictatorship run by the family dynasty of the late Lee Kuan Yew. John MvVey (below) has pointed -- correctly -- when the Singapore one-party dictatorship attempted to shut down the Far Eastern Economic Review and cajole The Wall Street Journal through its pliant judiciary that is barely independent of the state. There have been many other such incidents that clearly demonstrate that the Singapore dictatorship can not -- and will not -- handle the truth of facts but, rather like China, seek to twist truth and facts. This one-party dictatorship has also subjugated, or attempted to subjugate, foreign nationals working as academics in Singapore's so-called universities, research centers and unthinking think-tanks, all of which are conduits of the Singapore state's propaganda machinery. It's all very unsurprisingly Orwellian. That the Singapore dictatorship of Lee Hisien Loong is now demanding, like a spoilt child, that the Asian Sentinel retract the truth or face no access to the website by its Singapore readership, is a bald-face attempt by the Lee regime to maintain its record of being a political bully and purveyor of spin and canard. I suppose this meets the prerequisites of the Asian Values baloney that still gets spun around Asian traps.

Expand full comment

Well if they are one thing that is consistent and predictable…

Expand full comment

is this a so-called "own goal" situation? whew.

once again, thinking back to FEER days.

Expand full comment