When writing a balanced report is wrong
|Jul 22, 2014|
So I get a news report from a young reporter. “A car was in collision with a bath,”, it tells me.
Huh? So…. someone was driving a bath down a road?
No. She explains that the guy in the bath claimed that the car drove through the wall of his house (this happened in the US state of Oklahoma).
But she says decided to write that the car and the bath were in collision to “try to be fair and impartial”.
“Good thinking,” I told her. “Life is strange. An investigation might conclude that the car was innocently parked by the kerb when a house came roaring down the road and subsumed it.”
I suppose this actually might happen in New Zealand, where many houses are wood-framed and portable, and people drive homes around the way normal folk take dogs for walkies.
“Just taking the house around the block for a bit of air.”
If you’ve ever wanted to win a road race, go to Christchurch and get aggressive at the traffic lights with a man who has a two-story mansion on his trailer.
But the main point I wanted to make to the young reporter is that journalists these days have to be VERY careful, which is why we write things like:
“It will allegedly be cloudy with an alleged chance of rain, according to the alleged weather forecast released by our alleged government.”
Thus we avoid screw-ups. This columnist was recently reminded of one of his worst journalistic mistakes when reader Juanita Joseph sent a news link which said Kim Jong Un had scored 100 percent of the votes in an election.
I covered a North Korean election in the 1990s in which his dad Kim Jong-Il was the only candidate. I predicted he would win.
I was wrong.
The North Korean Electoral College discussed the issue for hours and finally gave the presidency to the corpse of the candidate’s father.
Losing any election is bad enough, but it must really hurt to be defeated by a decomposing pile of organic matter.
In my youth, I lost a student union election to a person who could only be described as a pile of decomposed organic matter, no offence intended to piles of decomposed organic matter.
But the truth is, being a reporter is harder than ever, now that news often breaks on social websites.
My new golden rule:
“Forgive those who sin against you: it’s easier than trying to work out how to delete their Facebook posts.”
Yet sometimes readers do send interesting tales through social media: like the guy who forwarded a report about two dogs who drove away their owner’s truck.
I guess this could have happened if they were jumping around and accidentally hit the controls.
But generally speaking, dogs hate machines.
If you want to break into any high security place protected by guard dogs, just carry a vacuum cleaner and make a zzzzhhhhhhhh noise.
Watch those Alsatians vanish.
Anyway, motorists: if you crash into a mountain going home today, tell people that you swerved to avoid a speeding bath driven by a pair of dogs.
With a bit of luck, your story may be covered by a young reporter determined to be fair and impartial. “A mountain was in collision with a car on the expressway today…”