| Sex-Tape Scandal Spices Up Malaysian Elections |
|
|
| Written by Imran Imtiaz Shah Yacob | |
| Wednesday, 02 January 2008 | |
|
A top Chinese official is driven from politics after a videotape of a sexual tryst makes the rounds in Malaysia
The DVD had been circulating in the southern state of Johor for more than a week when Chua, who also served as vice president of the Malaysian Chinese Association, which is part of the ruling Barisan Nasional, held a press conference to tell startled reporters that “I would like to verify that I am the man in the tape. The girl is a personal friend.” Despite a series of scandals over the past few months, including one in which a prominent lawyer was caught on tape discussing the appointment of compliant judges with the chief justice of Federal Court, no other politicians have resigned. If anything, the current affair points up the leniency towards corrupt officials by the leadership of the country’s largest party, the United Malays National Organisation. Indeed, the alleged hypocrisy has stirred comment online. One of the 54,000 YouTube viewers who watched a partial transmission wrote: “Why can all the ministers and leaders Malaysia rasuah (bribe) but not fuck? Why fuck need to letak jawatan (resign) but rasuah doesn't have to? Barisan National please step down. Keep in mind fucking minister will not make the country poor, but corrupted minister does. I do not mind all minister fucking around but please do not rasuah.” The videotape, which shows the pair undressing, appeared to have been shot surreptitiously. According to those who have watched the tape, there were two separate DVDs depicting the alleged sex act purportedly recorded using closed circuit television (CCTV) cameras. The first DVD, lasting 56 minutes, showed the entire sexual act from four different angles. In his press conference, Chua said, “I would like to emphasize that I did not make the tape. Who has done the tape and why is obvious,” he added, although he did not name the person he suspected, although analysts in Malaysia believe it came from infighting within the MCA. Police have vowed an investigation to seek out the cameraman. Indeed, the chairman of the division from which Chua was elected hinted as much, urging the MCA to act against those involved in the production and distribution of the DVDs. In any case, the scandal drives one of the country’s most publicly austere politicians out of politics. He also stepped down as a member of parliament and left all posts he held in the Johor MCA. By his own admission, he spoke with Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, Deputy Prime Minister Najib Tun Razak, leaders of the MCA and others in an effort to preserve his position, all to no avail. Badawi’s stance was signaled by an op-ed piece in the UMNO-linked New Straits Times Wednesday, written by Kalimullah Hassan, a close confidant of the prime minister. Entitled “Accountability, that elusive quality in politicians,” the piece suggested that Chua resign and save the government from “further anguish.” The departure presents considerable problems for Badawi. National elections could be held as early as the next month or two. An experienced politician, Chua’s organizational skills were expected to be an asset to the prime minister at a time when Malaysia’s Chinese, who make up 25 percent of the country’s population, are increasingly disaffected with the Barisan Nasional, observers say. Analysts expect Chua’s departure to throw the MCA’s political machinery into disarray, with a flock of other Chinese politicians jockeying for power to fill his seat as vice president. Ethnic Malays, most of them wedded to UMNO, make up slightly more than 50 percent of the population. The Chinese, most of whom have historically voted for the MCA, are crucial to preserving the Barisan’s two-thirds majority, which has precluded minority parties from any effective role in parliament whatsoever. However, in an atmosphere of increasing racial tension, in which UMNO members have made fiery speeches accusing the Chinese of holding a disproportionate amount of the country’s wealth and describing them as interlopers in Malay society, urban Chinese have reportedly begun casting an eye at the Democratic Action Party and Parti Keadilan Rakyat, two of the biggest opposition parties. Chandra Muzaffar, a political scientist and the head of the non-governmental organization International Movement for a Just World, said the manner of the videotaping raises suspicions. “His (Chua’s) enemies would have caused internal fighting within the MCA. Their ability to force this scandal and his eventual resignation may embolden other factions within the constituency and the MCA overall. So the MCA must put its house in order first before elections.” However, Muzaffar added, “Now that Dr. Chua has resigned it should be easier for the MCA and the Barisan to face the electorate. They would have been hard pressed to face the electorate if not for the resignation. The prime minister will be viewed in a better light. He can turn this to his advantage, saying ‘We don’t protect such leaders.’” Badawi reportedly has already reconciled himself to a lesser majority. He has stumbled from crisis to crisis over the last year over concerns ranging from the political ambitions of his son-in-law to alleged mismanagement of the economy. However, his most serious problems have stemmed from race-related issues. Chinese voters in particularly seem unimpressed by the premier’s lack of direction and perceived discrimination by the Muslim-Malay majority. A spate of recent street protests also saw the prime minister invoke the draconian Internal Security Act to jail five ethnic Indian protest leaders who organized a December march complaining that Indians had been marginalized in Malaysian society. The act allows for indeterminate preventive detention without trial. Former deputy premier Anwar Ibrahim has also put the heat on Abdullah’s administration with huge demonstrations by Malaysian standards in the capital city of Kuala Lumpur. Protesters thought to number around 30,000 accused the government of vote rigging and demanded fairer elections. Fearing a fall in support ahead of elections, Abdullah Badawi has reiterated that he was listening to the electorate. But the latest scandal hits at the core of a campaign that rests on the phrase Islam Hadhari, translated to mean Civilizational Islam, which espouses virtue in government. Chua apologized to the prime minister, the nation, his colleagues and his wife and children. “Who has done this tape is not important to me,” he said. “What is more important is that my family, my wife and children, have accepted my apology.” So far, his wife appears to be standing by her man, telling reporters that “he has been a good husband, father and family man who had never shirked his responsibilities,” adding that she had forgiven him.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Hits: 79594 Comments (34)
![]() written by Chief Nkereuwem Akpan, January 02, 2008
It worries me that whereas corrupt Malay oficials are condoned by the government but randy officials are forced to resign. Pray which is more important the private life of the person or his abuse of office for personal gain? Its about time that Malays learn from the Bill Clinton Monica Lewinsky saga that a randy official is better than a corrupt one.
written by Malay, January 02, 2008
With Hishamudin and his keris (Malay weapon) in full view, would any non-Malay believe that they would be safe under the administration of a war monger? Quit voting for Barisan. The chinese component is corrupted and the malay component supports viloence against non-malays.
written by Joseph M Fernandez, January 03, 2008
Meet Chua Soi Lek the latest martyr of Malaysian politics if mainstream Malaysian media is to be believed. Mainstream media coverage unabashedly paints Soi Lek as a victim, rather than as a horny toad whose comeuppance came swiftly Call a spade a spade. He screwed up literally and metaphorically. One does not have to be an ulama to stay morally clean. To suggest otherwise, as this toad does, is an affront to decent citizens. Soi Lek, you chose a career in public service. With that goes a higher benchmark of probity. Go with humility.
written by Elfie Choong, January 03, 2008
Datuk Sri Dr. Chua has the right to his privacy. No one should question his privacy. He is only human. Leaders who are corrupted and having many wives are no better than are worse than him and should be questioned.
written by Franz L Kessler, January 03, 2008
Research has shown that sex plays an important role in the life of primates and men. In particular, it's an antidote to stress. Societies with a lot of sex tend to be the relaxed and happier ones, whilst the others are getting stressed to the point of becoming suicide bombers. I'm not saying that what has happened is good, but politicians face an enormeous amount of protocol and stress, so what to do about it?
written by voxpopuli, January 03, 2008
Malaysian's are generally a very forgiving people.Chua need not have resigned.An apology and a commitment to do more for his constituents would have been enough.He is generally seen as a fair politician above race and religion and it really is a shame to see him go. We now have to contend with Corrupt Ministers( a bigger crime,really) and put up with their shennanigans and watch them go about their business scot free and above the law.Sheesh!
written by lala, January 03, 2008
“Why can all the ministers and leaders Malaysia rasuah (bribe) but not f**k? Why f**k need to letak jawatan (resign) but rasuah doesn't have to? Barisan National please step down. Keep in mind f**king minister will not make the country poor, but corrupted minister does. I do not mind all minister f**king around but please do not rasuah.”
this is so true. probably 50% of malay politicians are involved in both rasuah and scandals.. written by Sagaladoola, January 03, 2008
There goes the last person in MCA that can actually work. Anytime better than Chan Kong Choy, Ong Ka Ting and Ng Yen Yen.
So, now the last reason to vote for MCA has disappeared. Hmmpphhh.. written by F.TAN, January 03, 2008
Datuk Chua is an extremely capable leader and is one of the FUTURE gems that Malaysia has, sad - that his PERSONAL life has been outrageouly voilated. Datuk Chua should NOT be punished and asked to resign. Datuk Chua is a VICTIM already and the Government should give him FULL support in finding the REAL CULPRIT and punish the one who is responsible for invading the privacy of a MALAYSIAN GOVERNEMT OFFICER - a MINISTER.
By forcing Datuk Chua to resign, the Government may unconciously open the floor-gate to more of such "Politician Killings" in time to come. (We will have all the enemies of BN following all the BN candidates around with video cameras) WE, MALAYSIAN must act maturely and NOT judge a top perfomer by his private indulgence. Should we go around sacking politician who drink and get drunk (in private), who gamble (in private), who visited massage parlour, who have mistresses, who are into vice or who mistreat their wives or childrens? The same line of reasoning applies - then tell me, which is MORE HARMFUL TO THE SOCIETY OR THE COUNTRY FOR THAT MATTER? As long as they perform their role well as an elected PUBLIC figure, what they do privately should NOT be used against them UNLESS its criminal in nature. After all we are all human, we have "our own private moment." written by nowinnofee, January 03, 2008
Morality is a subjective issue and has been defined by many people. What is moral to me need not be moral to you. In the field of politics , I. Kant differentiates between a “political moralist” and a “moral politician” in order to clarify the fact that it is inherently wrong to alter the practice of morality for the sake of practicing strong politics. The “moral politician” adheres to morality first, practicing politics only in order to promote morality. Is Chua a moral person? but whose yardstick are we using...the other politicians in Malaysia? What is the measure being used? and whose values are we comparing to? To other politicians? If you are judging him with his close politicians, then I would say he is immoral. However, being a public figure, I believe, morality comes hand in hand. However, it is also understood that he is not the only horny politician, unfortunately for him, he got caught with his pants down...
But what is most interesting is his press conference which you can read in the STAR Malaysia, and do try to read in between the lines to know , that others may not be practising healthy political lifestyle. As he said, he is not the first and certainly not the last. Hey some have even got away with Murder!!!!! Perhaps what other malaysian politicians should learn from this is that politics is a practice of catering to the needs of the people , therefore it is only right that politicians establish the needs of the society as their top priority. written by LOne, January 03, 2008
There should be no place for randy, keris brandishing, racist or corrupt politicians in BolehLand but then again are we in BodohLand. Getting caught with one's pants done and then blaming others and first refusing to go is not honorable.
Chandra is no longer with Aliran. The Aliran chief is someone else. written by Liang1a, January 03, 2008
Politicians certainly should be allowed privacy. But at the same time since politicians are doing the business of the people, the people have the right to be sure that the elected politicians are moral uprighteous people who are the best people to do the people's job. Any politicians who engage in illicit sex and stupid enough to get caught certainly shed doubt on their morality and their discretion and competency and do not deserve to have the trust of the people and should either resign or be censured and dumped in the next election. Political leaders should be moral uprighteous people. Those who are not should not be allowed to lead.
But those who engage in outright corruption certainly should be exposed, impeached, and sentenced to long prison term. This is where Singapore and America are ahead of corrupt uncivilized countries such as Malaysia. Any Singaporean or American corrupt politician would immediately be impeached, tried, and convicted. But Malaysia does not even have the mechanism to punish corrupt officials. Or even if the mechanism exists to punish the corrupt officials, yet the people don't seem to care and the mechanism to punish the corrupt officials is unequally applied. It is time to sweep out the whole corrupt mess that is the BN and vote in a new age of reform, justice, equality, racial harmony, and prosperity. Malaysia should follow Singapore. written by PJ Lim, January 04, 2008
Being a public official at the Ministry of Health for the past 9 months, I was impressed with the concern and focus outlook of YB Minister of Health on the health sector. Rightly so. Being a public g figure , one should be well aware that every move is under the public's microcopic scrutiny. One has very ltd private life and sometime none at all, and one should be ready to sacrifice this. it is not easy but if one is willing to take up the post , one should be ready at all time like what the public slogan says Khidmat Berkorban .When I came to KKM , I was told, the Ministry is a mAD hOUSE; KemenTerian Kuat Makan, Kementerian Kuat Mesyuarat and NOW, this scandal! What 's next I wonder ... so sad for KKM to begin 2008 with!
written by Boon, January 04, 2008
No matter what the arguments are against how other ministers rasuah (corruption) or have mistresses or sin in any other way. The point is this guy got caught, hes a role model and representative of MCA. Who in Lapis would have the right mind to vote in someone that pays for prostitution. Hes broken the law and no matter how good he was as a health minister he should have done the right thing from the start and show some integrity and resign straight away.
The lot of MCA has no balls and it proves not only are they prostitutes of UMNO. They frequent them as well. written by TheWrathOfGrapes, January 04, 2008
Boon,
Sorry, what law has Chua Soi Lek broken? God's law? Adultery is sinful. Adultery is immoral. But unless the country is under theological rule, adultery is not illegal. And how has he been caught. Did he do it in public? For crying out loud, he was set up. The crime is committed by those who deliberately set up the hidden camera to film what is essentially a private act. Get off your high horse. Go on, cast the first stone. written by Arthur Borges, January 04, 2008
What's this guy's track record on the job? What he does in his spare time is his own affair!
At all events, he's got a great family. written by Arthur Borges, January 04, 2008
If a politician is "morally uprighteous", it disqualifies him for the profession and s/he ought to take refuge in a monastery/nunnery: do let's be real.
written by joe, January 05, 2008
Pls give him some credit la he just a man.we should be proud and learn from him right. it is normal to have sex.
if he a good MP i feel he should nor resign his post. not like where i come from!! written by joe, January 05, 2008
Pls give him some credit la he just a man.we should be proud and learn from him right. it is normal to have sex.
if he a good MP i feel he should NOT resign his post. not like where i come from!! written by Liang1a, January 05, 2008
Arthur Borges wrote:
“Oh Liang1a : Arthur Borges If a politician is "morally uprighteous", it disqualifies him for the profession and s/he ought to take refuge in a monastery/nunnery: do let's be real.” -------------------------------- I’m sure Borges’ astounding philosophy is very well received in such places as the Philippines and Myanmar. I’d like to hear what officials in Singapore and Finland have to say about it. As far as I can gather from Borges’ philosophical gem, a country is best served by staffing its government with crooks and lechers. I wonder if Borges will trust his trust funds - presuming he has any - to someone who has no moral sense at all. Or will he rather trust someone who is morally upright. Incidentally, Singapore and Finland are ranked among the top 4 while Philippines and Myanmar are ranked 131 and 179 respectively in world corruption index. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_Perceptions_Index written by Liang1a, January 05, 2008
Below are some figures on corruption and per capita GDP. In corruption index ranking, 1 is best.
Finland: Corruption index ranking: 1 Per capita GDP ranking: 12 - US$44,912 Singapore: Corruption index ranking: 4 Per capita GDP ranking: 21 - US$32,152 Philippines: Corruption index ranking: 131 Per capita GDP ranking: 117 - US$1,590 Myanmar: Corruption index ranking: 179 Per capita GDP ranking: 173 - US$239 It is quite apparent that there is a correlation between morality and prosperity. The more corrupt a country is the poorer it is. Does anybody still want his government led by a bunch of crooks and lechers? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corruption_index http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita written by Chief Nkereuwem Akpan, January 05, 2008
It about time the Malaysian authorities tackle curroption and turn around the life of the ordinary man on the street rather thanh concentrate on triffles such as this. Are the members of government expected to be saints? Then it would be better for the elctorate to insist on monks for elected offices
written by Liang1a, January 06, 2008
Chief Nkereuwem Akpan wrote:
It about time the Malaysian authorities tackle curroption and turn around the life of the ordinary man on the street rather thanh concentrate on triffles such as this. Are the members of government expected to be saints? Then it would be better for the elctorate to insist on monks for elected offices ------------------------------------------------- Corruption and loose morality go hand in hand. If you want an honest government then you have to have honest morally upright people in place to do an honest corruption free job. Of course, it is not right to fix exclusively on sex scandals while ignoring outright corruptions. Corruption certainly should be punished. But it is wrong to say that in order to eradicate corruption, immorality should be condoned and ignored. Furthermore, people who engage in illicit sex will need to give a lot of gifts and favors to his sexual partners. Which means he will run short of money and resort to corruption. Or in granting favors he will compromise his job as government officials. Honesty is necessary but “not sufficient” to be good and competent government officials. Therefore, monks and nuns, however honest they are, are not necessarily competent enough to be good government officials. But lechers and generally immoral people certainly are not fit to be trusted with government jobs. Corruption must be punished. But corruption can be minimized by removing immoral people in the first place. written by TheWrathOfGrapes, January 06, 2008
/// Corruption must be punished. But corruption can be minimized by removing immoral people in the first place. ///
Liang1a - in that case you have to remove more than 90% of the Malaysian cabinet, civil service and the police force. The guy who sermonized and told Chua Soi Lek off was himself involved in a huge sex scandal years ago. Many of UMNO politicians are equally scandalous, but none are punished because they are Bumi. Well, actually one was punished - Anwar Ibrahim - but that was for reasons MM knows best (well, actually most people know as well). Not all morally upright (perceived or not yet caught) people are incorruptible or not corrupt. Not all amoral or immoral people are corrupt. Bill Clinton was caught with his pants down as well, but he is arguably one of the better US presidents in recent years. Compare Bill Clinton to the preachy Jimmy Carter or the God-name-throwing George Bush who nonetheless whacked the hell out of Iraq on morally bankrupt trumped-up charges of WMD. written by Liang1a, January 06, 2008
Liang’s original post:
/// Corruption must be punished. But corruption can be minimized by removing immoral people in the first place. /// TheWrathOfGrapes wrote: Liang1a - in that case you have to remove more than 90% of the Malaysian cabinet, civil service and the police force. The guy who sermonized and told Chua Soi Lek off was himself involved in a huge sex scandal years ago. Many of UMNO politicians are equally scandalous, but none are punished because they are Bumi. Well, actually one was punished - Anwar Ibrahim - but that was for reasons MM knows best (well, actually most people know as well). -------------------------------------------------- I’d say remove 100% of the whole corrupt degenerate mess that is the Malaysian government. Start over with a new government from top to bottom that is modeled on the Singapore’s clean corruption free government. written by Liang1a, January 06, 2008
TheWrathOfGrapes wrote:
Not all morally upright (perceived or not yet caught) people are incorruptible or not corrupt. Not all amoral or immoral people are corrupt. Bill Clinton was caught with his pants down as well, but he is arguably one of the better US presidents in recent years. Compare Bill Clinton to the preachy Jimmy Carter or the God-name-throwing George Bush who nonetheless whacked the hell out of Iraq on morally bankrupt trumped-up charges of WMD. ------------------------------------------ True to some extent. But I’d say most morally upright people are more likely to be incorruptible. Conversely, more immoral people are likely to be corrupt. For each Clinton there is a Lincoln and F. D. R. As far as I can see Carter was not a bad president. Bush is an anomaly. The exception that makes the rule. Arguably, Bush, Jr. is one of the worst presidents in the US history. written by Liang1a, January 06, 2008
WrathofGrapes wrote:
the God-name-throwing George Bush who nonetheless whacked the hell out of Iraq on morally bankrupt trumped-up charges of WMD. ---------------------------- Like I said before, morally upright is necessary but not sufficient in itself. That is why monks and nuns are not necessarily competent enough to be high government officials. Nor could any morally upright people necessarily be competent enough to be the president of the US. There is also the difference between corruption in terms of embazzling government funds and the disastrous policies in terms of foreign relationship. written by Boon, January 07, 2008
Mate,
I don't know if I personally insulted you because you frequent spas or Geylang or have a mistress on the side. But personally I think this type of behavior is unacceptable. Your defence makes no sense 90% of the cabinet do it so its acceptable. This behavior is unacceptable he represents our health ministry and if you google well enough you can tell this idiot didnt even use a condom to have sex with a prostitute. No matter how a good a minister he is, imagine him visiting a hospital to see the sick and the old. What perception does he bring across? Has right and wrong been so warped that you think that this is acceptable behavior. Maybe you need to own a horse to sit on. ------------------------------------------------------- Boon, Sorry, what law has Chua Soi Lek broken? God's law? Adultery is sinful. Adultery is immoral. But unless the country is under theological rule, adultery is not illegal. And how has he been caught. Did he do it in public? For crying out loud, he was set up. The crime is committed by those who deliberately set up the hidden camera to film what is essentially a private act. Get off your high horse. Go on, cast the first stone. written by Liang1a, January 07, 2008
"But unless the country is under theological rule, adultery is not illegal."
--------------------------- Adultery may not be illegal in the sense of being punishable by law. But who in his right mind would want his government be run by some people who frequents prostitutes? written by pls, January 07, 2008
Hi, guys,
I can't hear you. Louder please! What???????? Sounds like a lot of Ong Ka Tings & Chua Soi Leks here! written by TheWrathOfGrapes, January 07, 2008
Boon,
This discussion is interesting and civil so far, so may I suggest you refrain from Ad Hominem attacks. I have not insulted you, yet you see fit to call me names, that I visit prostitutes and that I have a mistress. Sorry to disappoint you, but I am none of the above. Do take a leave from Liang1a and learn to debate in a civilised manner. Let's agree to disagree agreeably. Deal? /// I don't know if I personally insulted you because you frequent spas or Geylang or have a mistress on the side. /// What have I said that warrants this outburst? Why do you get your knickers in a twist? /// But personally I think this type of behavior is unacceptable. Your defence makes no sense 90% of the cabinet do it so its acceptable. /// Sorry, you are confusing yourself with Liang1a. That argument was not directed to you, but to Liang1a, so don't take things out of context. Agree, that this behaviour is unacceptable. My point to Liang1a was that there is more than meets the eyes. I didn't want to highlight it, but since you are so worked up, I might as well let you know what I think. DPM Najib was also caught with his pants down some time back in Port Dickson. What happened to him? Absolutely nothing, zilch. Did he have the honour to resign? No. Likewise, Thamby Chik was caught having sex with an underaged girl. What happened? He only resigned his CM post. My point is, racial politics is at play here. He should be charged and thrown in jail for statutory rape. My rebuttal is against your wrong assertion that Chua has broken the law. What law, I asked? Having sex with consenting adult of the opposite sex is not against the law, if my thinking is correct. It may be immoral. He may be sinful. He may be unfit for high office. But he did not break any law that I know of. Next, you claimed he has been caught, and I asked how was he caught. He was clearly set up, framed up in a sting operation. If he was having sex in a public place, he would have broken the indecency law. If he was a muslim and the moral police broke in and catch him, he would have violated the khalwat law. But he did none of these. My point is, there is a black hand behind trying to destroy Chua's political career. The point is, many politicians did what Chua did, but were not caught (no excuse, I agee). But even when they were caught, they were left off with a tap on the wrist because they were from UMNO and not from MCA. written by TheWrathOfGrapes, January 07, 2008
Boon - Part 2...
/// This behavior is unacceptable he represents our health ministry and if you google well enough you can tell this idiot didnt even use a condom to have sex with a prostitute. /// Chua said she's a personal friend. You assert that she is a prostitute. So I take it that you have specialist and inside knowledge. Agree with you that as Health Minister, he should practise safe sex and set good example. But then again, your gripes isn't about not using condom. You beef is that he did something illegal (which is not true) and that he was caught (he was set up, really). /// No matter how a good a minister he is, imagine him visiting a hospital to see the sick and the old. What perception does he bring across? /// Agree. But then again, if all who are in the same boat are exposed the same way as Chua, then there will be no one left in the Cabinet. /// Has right and wrong been so warped that you think that this is acceptable behavior. /// Can you tell which part of my initial post to you says I believe this is acceptable behaviour? That my sense of right and wrong has been warped. You made two unsubstantiated assertions which I believed were wrong, and I pointed those out. Did I approve of Chua's action? Yes, I approve of his honourable action of resigning once this is made public. Please read my original post carefully and s-l-o-w-l-y. /// Maybe you need to own a horse to sit on. /// This I readily accept. But accusing me of visiting Geylang? Having a mistress? Do you have the honour to apologize? Either go ahead and cast the first stone, or do the honorable thing. written by andry, January 08, 2008
The corruption issue is similar with sex scandal in malaysia, it is not just funny, in indonesia is culture to have corruption esspecially in police force, but in malaysia sex is more important to keep by anyone rather than corruption. Is it true or real thing ?
i see no doubt to say true thing. malaysia is good in sex scandal but indonesia police is more great to have corruption scandal. Banned me as true visual text journal ? I dont think so. Cause sex is from human body And Corruption is from human mind Go for better attitude ? neither malaysian or indonesian i think !! written by MMA, April 29, 2008
“Why can all the ministers and leaders Malaysia rasuah (bribe) but not f**k? Why f**k need to letak jawatan (resign) but rasuah doesn't have to? Barisan National please step down. Keep in mind,keep mind , keep going !!
Write comment
|
| Quacking Up in Hong KongJohn Berthelsen Full Story |
| Other Articles |