WEBwww.AsiaSentinel.com
Image RSS mobile
Wednesday
Feb 10th
  • Email Alerts
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Asia Sentinel



Home arrow Politics arrow Torture, Abuse Common in Burma’s Prisons
Torture, Abuse Common in Burma’s Prisons Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Mister.Wong
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Digg
Written by Mark Fenn   
Monday, 01 October 2007

The experience of past political prisoners offers an unsettling look at what Burma may have in store for those arrested in the current crackdown



"Death Row in Insein Prison" by Minn Mone

inseinprisonBurma’s military appear to have completed their brutal crackdown against Buddhist monks and protesters, with diplomats saying the death toll far exceeds the nine admitted by the regime, with hundreds, perhaps thousands, flung into prisons.  What will become of them? If the experience of political prisoners from past attempts to face down the military is any judge, then the future is grim.


During his interrogation, for instance, Thet Oo says he was deprived of food for three days and beaten so savagely that he suffered permanent hearing loss. His friend and fellow activist Bo Kyi was beaten every day for two weeks after prison guards found a page from a magazine that had been smuggled into his cell.


The two now live in relative safety in the Thai border town of Mae Sot, where they are active in the Assistance Association for Political Prisoners (Burma), or AAPP. Both spent years in prison for their opposition to Burma’s military government.


Thet Oo, 45, knows all about the hardships faced by political prisoners in Burma’s network of prisons, labor camps and interrogation centers. A cheerful, soft-spoken man who wears a hearing aid as a result of the beatings he received and walks with a limp left by childhood polio, he quietly recalled his 12 years in Rangoon’s notorious Insein Prison. He was arrested in 1993 for involvement with a banned pro-democracy group, was tortured and sentenced to 20 years in prison.


He says there were at least four people to a single small cell in the jail’s compound for political prisoners. The inmates received two basic, hardly adequate meals a day, and were allowed only a small ration of water to wash with.


At one point, Thet Oo was placed in shackles for a month. He and his colleagues kept themselves busy by studying English, playing chess, making handicrafts and meditating, he said. Sometimes friends and family members brought messages to him by rolling them in the filter of a cheroot. Thet Oo was released in 2005; he escaped to Mae Sot three months ago.


The assistance association has around 100 members here, with others living abroad. It supports current and former political prisoners by providing them with food and medicine. It also runs a small museum in Mae Sot, which is designed to resemble a prison cell and contains information on political prisoners in Burma and conditions inside the jails.


There are pictures of Aung San Suu Kyi, the 1988 pro-democracy demonstrations that were crushed by the regime and tributes to serving political prisoners and those who have died in prison. Other exhibits include photos and illustrations of torture methods.


The group has produced a harrowing report on the use of torture in Burma. It says beatings, electric shocks, sexual abuse of both men and women, solitary confinement and deprivation of food, water and sleep are all common.


Prisoners are often ordered to assume certain postures while being beaten, or hold them until they collapse. In one common position, prisoners must place their hands behind their heads and lean forward on the balls of their feet. Pins are then placed underneath their raised feet.


Sometimes they are ordered to crouch as if riding a motorbike, or perform a twisted version of a traditional dance, in which they must crawl over gravel on their knees and elbows, and sing. If they do not sing smoothly or cannot crawl, they are whipped with bamboo batons while other prisoners watch.


One former political prisoner described how during his interrogation, he was stripped and made to assume a similar position. Four drunken guards then found a large dog, made it mount his back, and used their hands to arouse its penis. They then placed the dog’s penis against the man’s anus. “I can forgive my torturers for everything but the sexual abuse,” said the victim. “No religion permits such an act. It has destroyed my self-esteem, my dignity.”


Some political prisoners have been told they are to be released and taken to the prison gate, only to be re-arrested and turned back around.


There are 43 major prisons in Burma, the group says, over 20 of which house political prisoners. There are 32 known labor camps and many interrogation centers.


Bo Kyi, the joint secretary of the AAPP, says 134 political prisoners have died in custody, usually due to torture, poor diet and inadequate healthcare. Those who survive often suffer mental and physical problems after their release.


Bo Kyi, 42, spent two terms in prison, a total of seven years and three months. He has been living in exile in Mae Sot since 1999. Like Thet Oo, he says he survived by keeping himself busy. He taught English to other prisoners, and says the inmates sometimes wrote poems and articles on the concrete floor with a piece of brick.


The AAPP’s museum, which has been open for almost six years, is not well known but attracts a number of visitors, often NGO staff and volunteers working with refugees along the border. Bo Kyi wants people to visit and find out more about the plight of political prisoners, but he is reluctant to advertise for fear of upsetting the Thai authorities in this politically-sensitive border area. Many former political prisoners live in exile in Thailand without the necessary papers, and they are constantly monitored by Thai security officials.


Living the exile’s life, Bo Kyi is cautiously optimistic about recent events. “It may be tomorrow, it may be next month, it may be 10 years,” he said. “We have to do our best.”

 

 

Comments (3)add
j. wagstaff\'s wsj article
written by paula tin nyo , October 10, 2007
At the end of the day, the generals have far more interest than outsiders in the internet images and have made more effective use of them. They can and have turned a profit from using them to identify "traitors", whereas the rest of the world was only able to derive an adrenaline rush from the images and the concomitant media income. The solution in such a sealed state can not be an impulsive uprising, but must stem from an increased interdependency of the regime with its immediate neighbors as well as the United States and other Western countries. Only when there are expats living there, industries established, ties made will it really hurt our interests enough that we would be willing to lift a pinky. Look at Iraq. If rubies powered cars and homes, my country's monks would not have died in vain.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
protest paparazzi and stock sell offs: Multilevel Governance in action
written by bookbagwarrior , October 02, 2007
Past time for chronicling "what" and shrieking our horror. It's past time to act. How?

CREATIVE COMBAT; TARGET JUNTA FRIENDLY COMPANIES;
The Burmese Junta can be defiant because friendly "rogue" companies continue to support them. Their answer is "OR ELSE WHAT??" meaning for as long as Chevron, Total of Thailand, French, Indian, Singapore companies continue to support them...it is business as usual folks. When the media coverage dies down..so will the outrage. That is what the junta is banking on and taking to the bank apparently. "UNLESS"...GLOBAL CIVIL SOCIETY...focuses its attention on action that can really hurt them. 1. Picket not the Burmese embassy in India, France, Singapore , and Thailand but the companies that do business with them. 2. Reporters without Borders or instant I citizen Reporters can follow CEOs and billionaires of these companies around paparazzi style to ask them about their support for the junta. I guarantee that getting their faces plastered all over the world as "rogue businessmen supporters of monk killing junta" will not go well in their golf games, country clubs, their daughters' debutant balls and pretensions or aspirations at high society... 3. Organize "stock sell off" demonstrations in front of the "stock exchange" buildings of junta friendly countries and ask investors to threaten "mass sell off" of stocks unless junta loving companies apply pressure on the junta to stop the killing and restore democracy...that's just for starters...I'm sure others can think of other "creative combat" strategies to answer their brazen response to world outrage of "or else what?"...that's what..

As an academic, I have no interest in the Burmese problem in order to promote a person (Su Kyi), political party (Democracy for Burma), religion (Buddhism), country (US, UK, China etc), or corporation. My interest is in truth and justice. If the Burmese ambassador to the UN really wanted to have his accusations of "neo-colonial" conspiracy against his country ring with credence...then TRANSPARENCY SHOULD BE NO ENEMY TO THEIR TRUTH. What makes him "incredible" is he makes these claims while allowing no opportunity for verification...so people like me who may be willing to give him an airing and put weight on neo-colonial and dependency theory arguments, find his claims without merit...
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Monastican , October 01, 2007
Mass Massacre of Myanmar Monks.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/worldnews.html?in_article_id=484903

Thousands of Monks being massacre and there is no room for jails within the nation so these dead bodies are dump in the deep jungles of Burma. Many Monks are "disappearing". The hollocast of mass murdering had occur in Myanmar. Some young officers of the military have defected to the peoples/monks/ side. Read the link above.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Alice Poon

Freedom of Expression Too Precious to Throw Away

Thursday, 04 February 2010 | Alice Poon

In a free society, there will always be more than one single opinion. In a free society, it is accepted that everyone should have an equal right to express his/her opinion without fearing...
Full Story

Previous posts:

Donate to Asia Sentinel

Enter Amount: