Asia Sentinel

Home

Economics/Business

Over the Cliff We Go

Tag it:

Written by Philip Bowring
Wednesday, 14 January 2009
China's imports collapse tells an ominous story for its trade partners Forget about the 2.9 percent fall in China's exports in December compared with a year ago. The statistic that should really shock is the fall in China's imports – a mammoth 23 percent last month to $72 billion, pushing its trade surplus to $39 billion. The data tell several different but interlocking stories. The first is that China's exports are about to fall as dramatically as those of its neighbors, Taiwan and Korea. Taiwan was down 40 percent in December and Korea down 17 percent. Embedded in the Chinese data is the additional statistic that excluding processing trade – the assembling and packaging business with mostly low value-added – imports fell 16 percent. In other words the processing trade was down by close to 30 percent. China is mostly at the final stage of the manufacturer's supply chain so it is natural that the steepest fall in exports will come after those of Taiwan, Korea and others who supply components to their assembly operations. Until around year-end China's export performance was reflecting more the third-quarter weakness in foreign markets rather than a fall-off-a-cliff fourth quarter. This explains why the trade data, while poor, do not reflect as yet the weeping and gnashing of teeth heard from the toy, electronics and assorted other assembly plants in the Pearl River delta, plants which have been laying off workers by the hundreds of thousands and appealing to governments in Hong Kong as well as Beijing for help. Some of this collapse in demand may prove short-term and that in reality consumer demand in the west for these items will not fall by more than 5 percent over 2009 as a whole. Some of the collapse in orders has been due to de-stocking, exaggerated by the financial crisis, which has limited trade credit. But it seems likely that at least some of the losses in orders for Chinese factories will be permanent as consumer demand patterns in the west alter, savings rise on a permanent basis, manufacturers locate assembly operations to cheaper locations such as Vietnam or ones closer to North American and European markets, and some Korean, Taiwan and Japanese ones bring work back home. But while China can gradually substitute domestic demand for some exports, the same is not true of the other sufferers from the collapse of China's imports – the suppliers of raw materials that lack the foreign currency cushion that China possesses. It is as yet hard to determine how much of the fall in materials imports values is due to volume cutbacks and how much to price falls. Most likely there has been de-stocking following the rush to buy supposedly scarce ores and fuels in the first half of 2008. So volume may begin to recover, at least by the second quarter of 2009. However, imports have almost certainly not yet fully reflected the price falls of the past few months. So it is not only the oil exporters who will be suffering but most of Southeast Asia and Australasia. Malaysia, Indonesia and Australia could all be facing declines of 20 percent in their terms of trade which will sustain Australia's already excessive current account deficit, turn Indonesia from a modest surplus to a deficit of perhaps 7 percent of GDP, and entirely eliminate Malaysia's surplus which had been running at double digits. Metals and energy exporters will be worst hit but crop producers, particularly palm oil and rubber, are suffering badly too. Rice has held up best. Though prices have fallen 35 percent from their May 2008 peak they are around average levels for the past 12 months and still significantly higher than two years ago. The US trade deficit is falling – the latest month is $40 billion, down from a peak of over $60 billion – and China's surplus is likely to moderate rather than disappear due to the falls in commodity prices. Europe and developed Asia will see export losses but gains from lower import prices. So the burden of trade re-adjustment will fall most heavily on commodity exporters. Most of the oil exporters can afford it even if they have to run down reserves. The most vulnerable nations are the developing economies of Asia and Latin America which will need to attract foreign capital to fill the current account void if they are to continue to grow. There is not much hope that the global private sector, now retrenching after years of easy money and rising profits, will be forthcoming. So what can the public sector do? The International Monetary Fund's Dominique Strauss-Kahn says his organization needs another US$150 billion to help developing countries through the crisis. That's actually peanuts compared with the numbers being bandied around in China and Europe, let alone the US. It is almost certainly far from enough if countries from Brazil to Indonesia via Turkey and India are not to have to see seriously curtailed growth and possibly re-impose restrictions on trade and access to foreign currencies. Yet the amount of which Strauss-Kahn talks is tiny compared with, for example, the reserves of Japan and Taiwan, let alone China's $1.95 trillion and even less than Korea's $200 billion in reserves, deemed by the market insufficient to guard against a run on the won. Unless the IMF is to be able to attract large additional funds from surplus countries, or to get them to agree to new SDR issues to provide foreign currency liquidity to a developing world, there must be strong logic behind the rapid emergence of an east Asian IMF which will focus on channeling at least some of its surpluses into hard-hit regional countries, and particularly those whose infrastructure needs and growing populations promise more substantial long run returns than can be achieved by holding US Treasury paper. For East Asia the question is whether it knows how to use its clout for common good, and if so whether it will elect to do so on a global or merely regional basis. Set as favorite Bookmark Email This Comments (5) Subscribe to this comment's feed Show/Hide comments Citigroup Shares Collapse written by SnoDad , February 27, 2009 Citigroup shares Collapse - http://www.capitalismgonewild.com report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +0 Confused written by Confucius , January 19, 2009 Why Hu cannot win the West's public perception? When we look for commodities in Africa and the likes, China are accused of neo-colonialism and driving up prices. When the world is in financial crisis engineered by Greenst and co., China now stand accused of not consuming enough of the commodities to stave off global recession. report abuse vote down vote up Votes: -1 Record Trade surplus written by Hu , January 19, 2009 We do not consider it as import collapse because China actually imported more commodities at a much reduced prices. Even when our export grows at a modest rate as compared to the past, we actually chopped up a very healthy trade surplus in 2008. report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +1 One pleasant surprise in this global recession was how quickly decision makers grasped what was happening. written by Keerock Rook , January 15, 2009 The last comment suggested that the ongoing global correction was due to "America's spending binge fed on greed from Wall street." Although that tells part of the story it does not reflect a world awash with excess liquidity creating investment niches like Yen carry trades, Overuse of credit and unwise risk taking was apparent in almost every country. Much of the mainstream media and analysts continue to target the doomsday statistic of the day without adequately reflecting on the interconnectivity of the global economy and the way economic patterns are at play in different areas and countries of the world. This article does, and it was a pleasure to read. To be sure this has been a scary ride, and there will be more unnerving days ahead, but the earlier panic has given way to more deliberate and thoughtful government decisions to address the source of unease, namely how much is actually at risk in banks and how can the financial systems be adjusted to isolate that risk so the economy can begin moving again. This can and will be done. report abuse vote down vote up Votes: +3 Unsustainability** written by Mao , January 14, 2009 I am surprised that everyone should go berserk when there is actually a necessary correction to the unsustainable America's spending binge fed on greed by Wall street. Oil and commodity prices went on a roller-coaster ride last year because massive speculation by hedge-funds and small punters who bet on the never-ending demand by China. Now the Arabs and Australiasian should just sober up and hope that the next commodity cycle is around the corner. report abuse vote down vote up Votes: -2 Show/Hide comment form Write comment Name Website Title Comment smaller \| bigger Subscribe via email (Registered users only) I have read and agree to the Terms of Usage. Write the displayed characters

[ Back ]

Winning Hearts and Minds in Afghanistan

Michelle Price

The grim truth of war remains: hearts and minds are lost in the campaign to get the enemy by the balls
Full Story

Alice Poon

Book About Land and Power in Hong Kong

Friday, 02 July 2010 | Alice Poon

The Chinese edition of “Land and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong” has finally come to life. The title of the book is “地產霸權” and it is co-published...
Full Story