WEBwww.AsiaSentinel.com
Image RSS mobile
Sunday
Aug 01st
  • Email Alerts
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Asia Sentinel



Home arrow Economics/Business arrow Hong Kong arrow Keeping the Trading at Home in Hong Kong
Keeping the Trading at Home in Hong Kong
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Mister.Wong
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Digg
Written by Stephen Vines   
Tuesday, 06 January 2009

ImageThe territory's oligarchs force the Hong Kong Stock Exchange to retreat



In hastily backing away from a plan to extend the blackout period on directors’ share trading, Hong Kong’s stock exchange has exposed the weakness of its regulatory clout and the cabal of influential tycoons used to calling the shots have the satisfaction of knowing that they can ensure that ‘Asia’s world city’ is free from implementing international best practices in the regulation of its financial affairs.

The formidable lobbying power of the oligarchs has never been in question but rarely has it secured such a rapid response and rarely have business leaders so blatantly combined to ensure the right to engage in dubious practices to the distinct disadvantage of their minority shareholders.

Just before the New Year the directors of 238 listed companies published a statement condemning the stock exchange’s plan to extend the blackout share trading from the closing of their books to the release of their results. The modest proposal, to replace an existing blackout period of just one month prior to results announcements, was designed to crack down on insider trading.

In effect the most prominent leaders of Hong Kong’s business community lobbied to ensure that possibilities for insider trading should be preserved and within the space of just 24 hours they managed to get the stock exchange to backtrack.

In a rather unconvincing statement announcing the retreat, the exchange’s listing committee said it would not withdraw the new rule but postpone its implementation until April; it remains to be seen what will happen then but the most unlikely outcome is that the exchange will implement its ban without modification. Meanwhile the exchange’s retreat means it has disregarded a motion by legislators endorsing the extension of the trading blackout period and it ignored the results of its own consultation exercise which came down decisively in favor of reform.

Why then were the directors of Hong Kong’s leading companies so keen to thwart a measure that would have helped to diminish the chances of insider information being responsible for share price movements prior to the announcement of company results?

One answer may be found in the fact that 34 percent of disclosed directors’ trading has occurred within the timeframe of the new blackout period.

But the suspicion lingers that Hong Kong directors seem to feel entitled to use insider knowledge when trading in the shares of their own companies. It is not simple to judge when this access to privileged information slips over into an area where criminality occurs.

The Stock Exchange has declined to conduct studies on the extent of insider trading prior to the announcement of price-sensitive announcements but it is widely known in Hong Kong that barely a single announcement of this kind has been made by a listed company that was not preceded by a significant movement in the company’s share price suggesting, at the very minimum, that some insider knowledge was responsible for the movement.

Studies of this phenomenon have been entirely confined to academic circles. Three of the biggest pieces of research by scholars have found clear evidence of insider trading connected to share price movements surrounding company announcements. The Hong Kong academics, Louis Cheng, T.Y. Leung and Rickey Szeto, looked at 3,177 instances of price movements in the period from 1993 to 1999 and concluded that there was widespread insider trading around earnings and dividend announcements. Coincidently, although published later, was a study covering the same period by three other academics: Eric Chang, Jun Zhu and J. Michael Pinegar which found that insider trades in Hong Kong were far more widespread than in the US and were rewarded with abnormally high profits. Meanwhile another research paper, by Elizabeth Wong at Stanford University, found ‘strong evidence that points towards suspicious insider-trading activities’ among the companies listed in Hong Kong which are controlled in the Chinese mainland.


Comments (3)add
0
ecomical devolepment
written by sunvalleyus , January 12, 2009
Now, the first task of HK is to deal with financial crisis.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
...
written by Croesus , January 09, 2009
How impertinent to suggest that Hong Kong's gilded company directors would stoop so low as to even for a nanosecond consider using insider information for their own gain. They are there, as they often tell us, to protect and to serve, so minorities can sleep comfortably in their beds.
However, in the current economic climate, closing this window of opportunity might force said directors towards defenestration of a voluntary kind if they can't get their manicured paws on the readies before the results torpedo the share price.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
0
HK capitalism
written by Mao , January 07, 2009
The comprador capitalists have now been transformed into cronyn Red capitalists.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +1
Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Alice Poon

Book About Land and Power in Hong Kong

Friday, 02 July 2010 | Alice Poon

The Chinese edition of “Land and the Ruling Class in Hong Kong” has finally come to life. The title of the book is “地產霸權” and it is co-published...
Full Story

Previous posts:

Donate to Asia Sentinel

Enter Amount: