| Thailand's Democrat Putsch |
|
|
| Written by Giles Ji Ungpakorn | |
| Monday, 15 December 2008 | |
|
Page 1 of 2
The appointment Monday of "Democrat" Party leader Abhisit Vejjajiva as the new Thai prime minister is the final stage of the second coup against an elected government. After the deliberate chaos created by the PAD's seizure of the airports, the courts stepped in to dissolve the hugely popular governing party for the second time. The Army chief then called a meeting of Democrat Party parliamentarians along with some of the most corrupt elements of the governing coalition parties. It is widely believed that the Army chief and others, threatened and bribed MPs to change sides. Chief among them is "Newin Chitchorp", who was named by his father after the infamous Burmese dictator. The Democrat Party is known among the cyber community as the "Cockroach Party". This is because cockroaches live in filthy places and can survive even nuclear holocausts. The party has survived for many years, forming governments after various crises. These so-called Democrats have systematically backed anti-democratic measures. They supported the 2006 coup, the military constitution and the PAD. One Democrat Party MP was the leader of the mob that took over the international airport. Over the last 30 years, the Democrat party has never won an overall majority in parliament. It does not represent the people. During the Thaksin years it spent the whole time criticising the universal health care scheme and other pro-poor policies. After the 1997 economic crisis it used state money to prop up the banks and guarantee the savings of the rich, while telling the poor to fend for themselves and depend on their families. Even Abhisit's name in Thai means "privilege". He is an Oxford graduate from a wealthy family. The first coup, on 19th September 2006, was a straightforward military coup, using tanks and soldiers wearing Royal yellow ribbons. The military junta tore up the democratic constitution and replaced it with an authoritarian one. Half the Senate was appointed by the military and many so-called independent bodies were staffed by junta supporters. The military appointed themselves to lucrative state enterprise positions. Then they got the courts to dissolve the Thai Rak Thai Party despite the fact that it had won repeated elections. Former Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra's Thai Rak Thai party was and remains hugely popular among the majority of Thais. This party introduced the first universal health care scheme and projects to stimulate village economies. The aim was to develop Thailand as a whole, increasing the education and health status of the general population, thus turning them into "stake-holders". This was a winning formula, an alliance between a pro-poor capitalist party and the poor, both urban and rural.
But
Thaksin's modernization plans, which also included major
infrastructure development such as public transport projects for
Bangkok, upset the Old Order. This "Old Order" is not
headed by the King, as many commentators think. The Old Order is made
up of local political mafias, the army, conservative judges and the
Democrat Party. They were joined by businessmen like Sondhi
Limtongkul, who initially supported Thaksin, but fell out over
personal interests. The People’s Alliance for Democracy
mobilised a fascist-style middle class mob to cause chaos. They
seized Government House, destroyed offices, stole weapons and then
tried to close parliament. Their final act was the takeover of the
two international airports with the open support of the military. The
PAD and the old order want to reduce democracy further. They want to
reduce the number of elected members of parliament, stiffen lese
majeste laws and destroy the alliance between the poor and Thaksin.
They are angry that the poor have become politicised. They hate the
fact that state budgets were spent on healthcare, rural development
and education. |
| The Risk of Travel in AsiaOur Correspondent Full Story |
| Other Articles |
| Freedom of Expression Too Precious to Throw AwayThursday, 04 February 2010 | Alice Poon
In a free society, there will always be more than one single opinion. In a free society, it is accepted that everyone should have an equal right to express his/her opinion without fearing... Full Story |
| Previous posts: |
| From vultures in Delhi, to coups in Pakistan, a journalist's un-edited take on current events |
Anyway the "Ben accusation" and ranting really amazed me, all of your accusation are mainly came from the PAD side and hardly hold any water. I dont understand how can you tied the Burmese government inhumane treatment to budhist monk to Thaksin's Sattlite business, I mean, where is it logically tied?? This gave me a impression that you are actually those that work for the PAD or the man that cant be name, so whatever you say. Your wide know truth hasnt even been prove yet, you know how dumb you make it sound? Now I have to admitted that I didnt read all of your comment, since one of the first thing u said is that Thaksin corruption case is a widely known fact and tell me to google it. yeah i'm saving you from all the embarassment. At least I can give an estimate of how much thailand lost during the air port close down, because IT IS A KNOWN FACT, put that in your thick skull. OH AND IF YOU DIDNT KNOW ABOUT THIS, LAST DECEMBER THE BANGKOKBIZ JUST CAME OUT APOLOGIZE ABOUT THE CTX SCANDLE NEWS BEACUSE THE NEWS THAT THEY REPORTED IN 2006 WAS A "HOAX" YEAH GOOGLE IT.
And last shot at Andres - dude the last thing I expect is a SWEDISH commenting on my english - what a fool.