| China and the US Presidential Election |
| Written by Richard Komaiko | |
| Friday, 11 July 2008 | |
|
Which candidate is best equipped to deal with China? H
The questions are undoubtedly important, but they miss the bigger picture. US national power has diminished remarkably over the last seven years. With the economy in recession and the military bogged down in two foreign wars, America has at her disposal fewer carrots and fewer sticks with which to influence the behavior of other states than at any time in recent memory. Thus, the question is not which candidate will choose the correct tools to project US national power, but rather which candidate would choose the correct tools to restore it. Voters must consider how each candidate would perform in a world that is increasingly dominated by Chinese interests and which candidate is best equipped to work constructively with China in order to pursue US strategic interests. However, neither campaign has said much about China. This article will attempt to explain the basics of each candidate’s China policy, how each candidate is perceived by China, and what this means for America. At the 2005 annual dinner of the Committee of 100, a group of prominent Chinese Americans, Senator John McCain summarized his approach to China with the following approximation. “Yes, we should engage China. But we should not only engage; we also need to hedge.” McCain went on to explain that hedging does not necessarily imply an attempt to prevent China from achieving great power status, “but it does mean maintaining our military presence in East Asia, strengthening our alliance with Japan and our relations with other Asian countries, and working through groups like the APEC forum to further American interests and values.” “Senator Obama sees our relationship with China as a combination of important elements of cooperation and important elements of competition,: says former Ambassador Jeffrey Bader, the director of the John L. Thorton China Center at the Brookings Institution in Washington, DC and unofficial advisor to the Obama campaign for China policy. “He wants to broaden the cooperative elements and at the same time strengthen our ability to compete. He has a very pragmatic approach to China.” At first glance, the distinction between the McCain strategy of engagement plus hedging and the Obama strategy of cooperation plus competition might seem like mere semantics. But there is an important difference between the two strategies. One implies the ability and right to contain if necessary, while the other merely expresses an ambition to compete. Setting aside for the moment, the question of which strategy is more diplomatic, which strategy is more realistic given the state of the world today? Seven years ago, it might have seemed reasonable at the time to talk of containing another country, even one as weighty as China. According to Bader: “At the outset of the Bush administration there was tension between those who sought to contain China and reorient US policy in a much more aggressive way and those who wanted to pursue traditional kinds of engagement with China.” The US and China had no diplomatic relations between 1949 and 1972. Relations recommenced with Nixon’s historic visit to China in 1972, and have mostly improved steadily every year since. Sino-American relations reached a height in 2000 when the US supported China’s bid to join the World Trade Organization. At the outset of the Bush administration, however, attempts were made to portray China as the US’s next great enemy. In 2001 an American EP-3 spy plane was forced down in China, prompting an impasse between the two countries over allegations of espionage, safe return of the plane’s crew, ownership of the wreckage and the stealth technology aboard the plane, etc. All of this lent credibility to the idea that China was certain to become America’s primary enemy. After 9/11, however, the focus of America’s national security establishment shifted from China to terrorism. Bader went on to say “I have seen the names of some of the people associated with the McCain campaign on China, those who are advising him, and they do have a certain tendency to replicate some of the divisions that we saw within the Bush administration, particularly in the earlier years. Some of the people who were associated with the harder-edged containment style that President Bush ultimately turned away from seem to be coming back through Senator McCain. In the event that Senator McCain becomes president, his administration would have to sort through the two wings to decide which one really represents his China policy.” Whichever candidate wins the presidency, he will almost certainly be sworn in before a Democratic Congress that is gripped with concerns about the size of the bilateral trade deficit, product safety, currency manipulation and intellectual property piracy. The winner will face great pressure to address these issues. In order to resolve them artfully, it is essential that the next president possess the ability to work with the Chinese side constructively, competently, and credibly. For this reason – a purely nationalistic reason – American voters should care how each candidate is perceived by Chinese leaders. McCain, while highly respected, is perceived as a member of the old guard. In particular, his position on Iraq makes him unattractive to Chinese policymakers. Chinese see the Iraq war as a symbol of unchecked American hubris. Not only has McCain defended the basis of the war despite its proven flaws, he has also vowed to maintain an American presence in Iraq for 100 years if necessary and to commit an unlimited number of troops. To a Chinese audience, his commitment is perceived as a defense of the vulgar notion that America can do anything it pleases anywhere in any way. Additionally, McCain has stated that if he were president he would not attend the opening ceremony of the Beijing Olympics, a moot point since the Olympics will take place well before the election, but a statement that has not escaped the scrutiny of the Chinese, who have made the Olympics a point of overwhelming national pride and prestige. On multiple occasions, McCain has characterized the Chinese government as lacking maturity. All of these factors have made China rather lukewarm to his candidacy. Obama, too, has made comments that have been perceived as incendiary to a Chinese audience. Regarding currency manipulation, he has threatened to “take China to the mat.” Despite this, he enjoys a very strong reputation in China. For starters, he was educated at the same Hawaiian prep school as Sun Yat Sen, the father of modern China. The two men’s attendance at the Punaho School occurred nearly a century apart, so the connection is admittedly a weak one. However, because Sun cast such a large shadow over Chinese thinking, this connection nevertheless confers upon Senator Obama a certain amount of gravitas in the Chinese sphere. Moreover, Obama’s initial and continuing opposition to the Iraq war have earned him substantial credibility amongst Chinese foreign policy elites. They see this as evidence of wisdom and temperance. Finally, Chinese thought leaders look favorably upon Obama not just for who he is, but also for what he is. According to Cao Heping, the dean of the Economics School at Peking University, Obama’s ethnicity sends a strong message to Chinese observers. “I cannot imagine China having a president who was not ethnically Chinese,” Cao said, “so it would be very impressive if America had a president who was not ethnically European.” Cao’s phrasing belies an interesting feature of the Chinese world view. Beginning with the Opium Wars in the 19th Century, many people in China became convinced that Europe was intent on gobbling up the Middle Kingdom as a part of a plan for global domination. Indeed, the entire enterprise of the US was considered to be nothing more than a means of extending European culture and influence. To the extent that this view has persisted, it has had a negative influence on Sino-American relations: if the US is perceived as a mechanism of imperialism, then any enhancement of America’s position in the world would be perceived as illegitimate. However, this view crumbles before Obama’s candidacy. Presented with the sight of an African descendant holding the top office, one could not possibly maintain the belief that America is a mere platform for extending European culture and influence. Even the most xenophobic, nationalistic Chinese observer would be forced to concede that America is a nation for all peoples. China’s centrality to world affairs increases each day. Improving America’s future will depend on the ability to work constructively with the Chinese side. In this light, it seems curious to spend time asking whether the candidates would be willing to sit down to talk with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. It is far more important to ask: when the candidates sit down to talk with Hu Jintao, what will they say? Comments
(9)
 written by Lislet , October 29, 2008
I believe that Obama will make better decisions across the board on foreign policy for one single reason: He's open to talking!
Votes: +0
A relationship between countries is not much different than a relationship between people: you like some of them, hate some of them, are ambivalent to some of them, and sometimes get into fights. Now, last time I checked, the "pretend the other person isn't talking/doesn't exist" never works out well in any relationship; the response from both sides tends to be negative and incredibly immature. So that makes me wonder, why does McCain believe that this same puerile tactic is a good idea in the global sphere?!!! That one issue alone sets the tone for how McCain deals with China, all of Asia, Europe, because that response suggests and inherent belief of "I'm better than you, you'd better follow my orders or else". And sure, maybe eight years ago America could have pulled that off, but not right now. Right now we need diplomacy. And the very basic part of diplomacy is TALKING. report abuse
vote down
vote up
No doubt, China is an important foreign policy issue. Obama point of view o this subject is more practical and sensible We must compete at the same time have to have our strategy in this region must grow stronger. But as a voter we must utilize our voting right in this election to select a better candidate.
Votes: +0
Beat Long Poll Lines with Absentee Ballots from StateDemocracy.org Many state and local election officials are encouraging voters to use Absentee Ballots to avoid the long lines and delays expected at the polls on November 4th due to the record-breaking surge in newly registered voters. Voters in most states still have time to obtain an Absentee Ballot by simply downloading an official application form available through www.StateDemocracy.org, a completely FREE public service from the nonprofit StateDemocracy Foundation. Read More: http://us-2008-election.blogsp...entee.html report abuse
vote down
vote up
 written by Free Marketer , July 26, 2008
First of all, this Obama campaign piece should not be regarded as a neutral essay about the two US presidential candidates. Using loaded words linking America with imperialism (a total crock), and finding only one sentence (dismissed in the next) of criticism of Obama belies the writer's true bias.
Votes: -1
If, as the writer implies, America is 'imperialist,' it would have taken the defeat of Japan as pretext to colonialize the ravaged China, much like the true imperialist nation, the USSR, which used its victory against Nazi Germany as a pretext to colonize and enslave all of Eastern Europe. These propagandistic, jingoistic comments are but a few leveled at the US by this writer to bolster the thin case that Obama is the savior, the Messiah who will rescue precarious Sino-American relations from the 'war mongering' Republicans (note his linkage of McCain with Bush - talking points of the Democratic National Committee). Obama, in the pocket of labor unions, considerable other special interests, will reveal himself as the most protectionist president in modern US history. The writer refuses to mention this for obvious reasons. All other Euro-biases of Obama - recently displayed in the candidate's overseas campaign trip - if logically connected to the writer's xenophobia about Euro-colonialism, should have led him to the conclusion that Obama represents the most serious obstacle to free-market based open relations between China and the US. Obama is a stealth candidate who knows he must hide his true intentions to be elected. Sad that so many on both sides of the Pacific cannot see through the demagoguery. McCain, a free-marketer with no ties to leftist Europe values of elitism and the region's sordid history of colonialism, is disliked by Europe, and merely for this reason should be considered a far better choice than Obama as a future friend of China. report abuse
vote down
vote up
"In a recent speech to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Obama offered such ardent support for Israel that he had to backtrack just a few days later. Obama, working to woo Jewish voters, told the lobbying group that he supported Israel retaining control of Jerusalem. The comment so infuriated many Arab leaders that he was forced to issue a clarification that he didn't oppose Israeli-Palestinian negotiations over the future of the city.
Votes: +0
Obama also has raised concerns among Israel's supporters because of his willingness to speak to Iran, while some have expressed concern about his Muslim roots. Obama's father and stepfather were Muslim and he spent part of his childhood in Indonesia, the world's largest Muslim country. But he is a Christian." report abuse
vote down
vote up
 written by Melvin Moronovich , July 14, 2008
"Man united" comment is bizarre. "Even" Asian? And you think McCain's view in Hanoi Hilton made him even more US-centric? May be u are right. Mostly I think you are the same guy who posted the first comment, which was antisemitic. I challenge you to a a duel. Place TBD, but preferably in the Nachos public square of BaghDad.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
 written by smart dragon , July 14, 2008
It always boggles me to see how USA is manipulated by the Jewish lobby. How the new President treats China will depend on how the Jewish lobby decides. If the Jews think it is better to make China their best friend(and maybe make China their new satellite?) then the US of A will bend over to please the Chinese.
Votes: -1
report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
The
2008 American presidential election is fast approaching. Thus far,
the foreign policy debate has been focused on a few divisive themes.
Which candidate would deliver the most crushing retaliation in the
event of an Iranian strike against Israel? Which candidate would be
willing to sit down and talk with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad? In pursuit of
the American interest, which candidate would employ the correct tools
to project US national power?
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Show/Hide comments
Show/Hide comment form
India's Thirst for EnergySiddharth Srivastava Coal surge is unabated, raising environmental concerns
Full Story |
| Other Articles |
The Great Game for the SpratlysPhilip Bowring Vietnam takes command of the issue
Full Story |
| Previous posts: |
Alice Poon
| Anti-Anti-Speculation ActionTuesday, 24 August 2010 | Alice Poon (潘慧嫻)
It seems that the SAR government finally decided to choose
the lesser of two evils: taking decisive, albeit belated, anti-speculation
measures in the hope of stabilizing prices, rather than... Full Story |
| Previous posts: |
John Elliott: Riding the Elephant
| From vultures in Delhi, to coups in Pakistan, a journalist's un-edited take on current events |
|
Donate to Asia Sentinel
Archive
- Rivalry Grows Between China's Top Leaders
- South Korea's Nuke Waste Problem
- Indonesia's Aceh Province and Shariah
- Noynoy Repeats his Mother's Mistake
- Malaysia's Uneasy Dance with the Web
- Thailand's Disheartening Aftermath
- Thinking the Unthinkable for Korea
- Japan's Atomic Political Minefield
- The Great Game for the Spratlys
- Papuan Independence Leader Claims Abuse
Are you ready yet for the November 4th Elections? How about your friends, family, and neighbors?
More Americans are expected to vote this year than ever before in history, so don’t be left out! Be sure to ask everyone you know the following questions:
Are you registered to vote? If you moved recently, have you updated your voter registration?
Can you find your local Polling Place? Do you know it may have changed from last time?
The answers to these questions -- and all your voting needs -- can be found at www.StateDemocracy.org -- the FREE 1-Stop citizen empowerment portal that Delivers Democracy to your Desktop! StateDemocracy is among the Internet’s first (since 2001) and most encompassing civic empowerment tools.
In order to boost voter participation this year, StateDemocracy.org is offering FREE widgets for all 50 states. You can simply download and embed these widgets into your own website so your visitors can register to vote, get an absentee ballot or find their local polling place.
Lobby Congress Via StateDemocracy
StateDemocracy.org also equips you to maintain an active dialog with your state and federal lawmakers once they are elected. And RIGHT NOW is an especially opportune time to contact your U.S. Senators and House Member, as Congress takes up major legislation on such issues as offshore oil drilling, another economic stimulus package and all federal appropriations bills over the next few weeks.
As you lobby your elected officials, remember that lawmakers view your constituent input as reflective of scores of other citizens who felt similarly, but didn’t have (or take) the time to share their opinions.
LobbyDelegates.com Further Empowered Grassroots Voices
Over the past 5 months, you may have visited www.LobbyDelegates.com, along with 26,000 other visitors. This latest public interest portal by the StateDemocracy Foundation remained the only online tool enabling rank-and-file Democrats to lobby all 800+ Super Delegates on which candidate to back for the party’s Presidential nomination.
StateDemocracy Foundation Website Users Unite!
Many of you have used our StateDemocracy.org and LobbyDelegates.com tools in recent times, and have hopefully found your experience uplifting and empowering. I encourage all of you to help spread the news about StateDemocracy.org to enable more of our fellow citizens to Connect! Engage! And Empower!