WEBwww.AsiaSentinel.com
Image RSS mobile
Wednesday
Feb 10th
  • Email Alerts
Text size
  • Increase font size
  • Default font size
  • Decrease font size

Asia Sentinel



Home arrow Economics/Business arrow Bad Biofuel Policy Boosts Asian Inflation
Bad Biofuel Policy Boosts Asian Inflation Print E-mail
Tag it:
Delicious
Furl it!
Mister.Wong
NewsVine
Reddit
YahooMyWeb
Technorati
Digg
Written by John Berthelsen   
Tuesday, 19 February 2008

The US decision to divert food crops for motor-fuel is proving a costly mistake – especially for Asia


asia-biofuelsWhat has long been predicted – that the US decision to push the use of corn to make biofuel would be a costly mistake – is starting to come true, especially for Asia, where inflation is spiking with an ugly force.

China reported on Tuesday that the increase in its Consumer Price Index hit 7.1 percent annually, driven partly by food, which accelerated to 18.2 percent annually in January from 17.7 percent in December.

China’s disastrous cold spell gets the immediate blame for blocking thousands of kilometers of roadway and cutting power and transport links to tens of millions of people, collapsing more than 350,000 homes and causing direct economic losses of 111 billion yuan (US$15.5 billion) while damaging as much as 40 percent of the country’s rapeseed crop, the major source of cooking oil and animal feeds, which is driving up food prices.

Obviously there is more to Asian inflation than food prices. China’s Purchasing Price Index of raw materials rose by 8.9 percent year-on-year in January, with energy up 15.5 percent annually and power up 15.2 percent; ferrous metals rose 14.8 percent.  But beyond that, world edible-oil and animal-feed prices have skyrocketed, with edible oil prices up overall by 63 percent for reasons that have nothing to do with China’s weather. Soybean oil is leading the price rise after soybean futures for May delivery on the Chicago Board of Trade rose to US$13.87 per US bushel last Friday, the highest price ever. Soybeans have surged by 85 percent alone in the past year. Palm oil is also up 71 percent annually.

Along with other culprits, including rising fuel use, the heart of the problem is the decision by the US government and other western governments to subsidize the production of ethanol and bio-diesel in an ill-considered strategy to cut greenhouse-gas emissions. Thomas Tanton of the Pacific Research Institute in San Francisco was quoted as saying that by 2012 ethanol producers will receive as much as US$93 billion in subsidies, accounting for up to 65 percent of the market value of the product.

That has caused a precipitous decline in the amount of soybeans planted in the US as farmers switched to more lucrative crops. Some 16 percent of agricultural land formerly planted in soybeans and wheat is now being planted in corn, according to the US Department of Agriculture. More corn – 86.7 million acres (35 million hectares) in 2008 – is being grown in the United States today than at any time since World War II ended 63 years ago. There is a full 600,000 acres (242,800 hectares) more now than in 2007.

Because of it, environmentalist Lester Brown of the Earth Policy Institute wrote on January 24 that “the world is facing the most severe food-price inflation in history as grain and soybean prices climb to all-time highs. Wheat trading on the Chicago Board of Trade on December 17 breached the $10-per-bushel level for the first time ever. In mid-January, corn was trading at over $5 per bushel, close to its historic high. And on January 11, soybeans traded at $13.42 per bushel, the highest price ever recorded. All these prices are double those of a year or two ago.” (A US bushel is about 35.2 liters.)

As a result, Brown wrote, everything from bread to tortillas, not to mention pork, beef, poultry, milk and eggs, is soaring in price. In Mexico, he wrote, cornmeal prices are up 60 percent, and in Pakistan flour prices have doubled.

The soybeans that corn is replacing are about as close as it is possible to come to a miracle crop. Domesticated during the Chou Dynasty perhaps 3,000 years ago, they were designated one of China’s five sacred grains along with rice, wheat, millet and barley. Their deep root system makes them resistant to drought. Growing in long green rows perhaps a meter high, they actually take nitrogen from the air instead of requiring nitrogen fertilizer – a growing problem for the United States. Corn takes so much nitrogen fertilizer that, according to the US-based Environmental Working Group, 210 million pounds (95.4 million kilograms) of nitrogen-based fertilizer is running off Corn Belt states and eventually into the Mississippi River, where it is contributing to what is being called a dead zone some 7,900 square miles (nearly 20,500 square kilometers) in area that is so depleted of oxygen that fish and crustaceans are suffocating.

Despite their use in such products as diverse as composite building materials, miso, fox and mink feed, magnetic tape, rubber, margarine, foam insulation and mayonnaise, soybeans’ biggest use is for edible oils and soybean meal, virtually all of which is used as an ingredient to feed poultry, hogs and cattle. The US Department of Agriculture in December projected consumption at 2.988 billion bushels (105.3 billion liters) against year-end 2007 stocks of only 185 million bushels, providing no surplus for consumption during the 2008-09 market year. Demand is expected to outrun supply for at least the next three years.  

That is being felt in Asia, which historically has been the biggest destination for American soybean farmers. With the exception of soybeans, China has become a major crop exporter, with 2.85 million metric tons of foodstuffs exported in 2006, vastly increasing to 7.7 million metric tons through November 2007. Despite its exports, China, however, is the world’s largest importer of soybeans and vegetable oil.

At the other end of the supply chain are at least 20 million Chinese who are moving into cities each year, increasing their wages and improving their diets, which usually means increased meat consumption, particularly after annual incomes hit about US$3,000. With roughly half the price of a helping of meat determined by what the animal eats, that means prices are going up rapidly. Much of that meat is produced from soybean meal, not only in pigsties across China but on vast cattle ranches in South America. Brazil produces 28 percent of the world’s soybeans and is the largest exporter, sending 41 percent of its crop overseas. Argentina is the third-largest producer and consumer.

The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization global food price index rose 40 percent in 2007, compared with 9 percent in 2006, spurring the FAO to warn of possible global food shortages for the first time since 1970. That is playing itself out across Asia. GDP across the region outside Japan is being revised down by about half a percentage point, while inflation is being pushed up from 4.2 percent to 4.6 percent or more, presenting central banks with the dilemma of responding either by cutting growth by using high interest rates, or allowing inflation to increase in an effort to keep growth going.


Related Articles:

Selling Snake Oil with the Bio-fuels


Comments (4)add
...
written by hnzplas , March 01, 2008
Maybe people will wake up to the idea that overpopulation is the main problem. Also businesses say they must get bigger and increase profits. The only way they can do this is by encouraging us to all spend more and eat more. What is wrong with products that last 10-15 years? If our goods did this there would be a lot less fuel used for transportation etc.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
...
written by Liang1a , February 22, 2008
paal wrote:
Stop the biofuel havok today , it's a dead end.
Use your calculator for once .......
--------------------------------------
Biofuel is not a dead end. On the contrary, it is the salvation of the world. Without biofuel, there will be catastrophic global warming. Furthermore, oil will run out in due time because when they're gone, they're gone forever. And in the meantime, the price of oil will go up to not just $100 per barrel as it is already but to hundreds of dollars per barrel. And that will create even more inflation in all things and not just in edible oil. So it is foolishness to say that biofuel is bad becauses it creates inflation. Without biofuel and other energy such as nuclear, wind, and solar, the inflation in the cost of fuel will surely be much more catastrophic.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: -1
If only a fraction of this is true
written by paal myrtvedt , February 21, 2008
If only a fraction of this is true, it is the most scary essay I've ever read. What will happen if these scenarioes copy themselves every few years from now?

Has the UN gone mute , or gov'ts gone deaf or have bote gone blind.

Stop the biofuel havok today , it's a dead end.
Use your calculator for once .......
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
...
written by Liang1a , February 21, 2008
The reason why soybean is imported into China and other SE Asian countries is because it is cheaper to produce in Brazil and Argentina. But if the price of soybean keep rising, then it would become viable for the farmers in Asia to produce it. Also genetic engineering may increase the yield of soybean for various regions of Asia. While soybean was indigenous to China, it is Italy that produces the largest yield per hectare of land,

http://www.wwf.de/fileadmin/fm-wwf/pdf-alt/waelder/umwandlung/ Soybean_Where_is_it_from_and_what_are_its_uses_2002_WWF
_Schweden_Studie_.pdf

(page 9 at the above link)

China: 1705 kg/hectare
Italy: 3671 kg/hectare
Indonesia: 1239 kg/hectare
India: 947 kg/hectare
Brazil: 2400 kg/hectare
USA: 2561 hg/hectare

There is no reason why China should import soybean. It must improve the yield through genetic engineering or genetic modification so get higher yields and use larger farms using bigger machines to lower the cost of production. The large difference in the yield per hectare shows that yield can increase several times for China, India, Indonesia and other SE Asian countries through genetic engineering for higher yielding plants. In the end, the rise in edible oil prices represents new opportunities for the farmers in China and SE Asia.

Also, the use of biofuel is necessary to fight global warming. So it is not right to condemn the US for producing more biofuel. The thing to do is to produce more soybean in Asia both for the benefit of global warming and the benefit of the Asian farmers. It is time for them to get a break in terms of higher incomes. Right now the incomes of the Chinese farmers is around 3,500 yuan while the incomes of the urban residents are more than 10,000 yuan.
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Votes: +0
Write comment
smaller | bigger

security image
Write the displayed characters


busy
 

Can China Afford its Belligerence?

Wednesday, 03 February 2010 | Gerry O'Kane

article thumbnailRocket-rattling over a Taiwanese arms package isn't doing anybody any good
Full Story

Previous posts:

Alice Poon

Freedom of Expression Too Precious to Throw Away

Thursday, 04 February 2010 | Alice Poon

In a free society, there will always be more than one single opinion. In a free society, it is accepted that everyone should have an equal right to express his/her opinion without fearing...
Full Story

Previous posts:

Donate to Asia Sentinel

Enter Amount: