| Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang |
|
|
| Written by David Lyons | |
| Wednesday, 18 July 2007 | |
|
By James Millward
The province is best known as China's “restive” Muslim province, the source of domestic oil wealth and a front in the “Global War on Terror”. In recent years, a great deal of ink has been spilt on the topic of its contemporary political drama, in which both sides namely the Chinese government and Uyghur exiles – have armed themselves with historical figures and dates, while Western observers have often been drawn to a “clash of civilizations” storyline, especially in the wake of September 11.
It is thus both timely and important that the first comprehensive history of Xinjiang seeks to place these events in their proper historical context, and also treats the claims of both political factions with the skepticism they deserve. It is a place that has seen wars between dozens of Eurasian powers, both great and small, and in a context that includes “minarets of skulls,” camel-mounted cannon and a plethora of assassinations at banquets, not to mention the horrors of the Cultural Revolution and both World Wars. In this context, claims of a “holy war” are greatly exaggerated.
James Millward, an associate professor of history at Georgetown University, is one of the preeminent scholars on Xinjiang today. His new book, Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang, expands upon two chapters he contributed to Xinjiang: China's Muslim Borderland, the book undoubtedly Millward is referring to in his preface that “was smuggled to China, translated, circulated and rebutted internally in the PRC before it had even been published in the United States”.
The Pro-Beijing Hong Kong paper, Ta Kung Pao, recently wrote that the previous book was the theoretical basis for Xinjiang’s secession in the event of a Sino-American war. Such subterfuge demonstrates the political sensitivity of Xinjiang in the halls of Zhongnanhai, and the prominence of history as a major battlefield for legitimacy. It is doubly to Millward's credit, then, that he is skeptical not only of China’s claim that Xinjiang has been in the motherland “since ancient times”, but that he also turns a critical eye on the historical claims of Uyghur exiles abroad.
A great deal of Xinjiang’s history is not anywhere near Xinjiang. In writing his book, Millward visited archives in Paris, Stockholm, Beijing, New Delhi and Tokyo, searching both national archives and the collections of archaeologists, missionaries, spies and occultists. There is little doubt, given its geographical proximity, that China has played the biggest role in Xinjiang's history, although when read the other way, Xinjiang has played one of the biggest roles in China's interaction with the world. The province’s history turns the history of China and its periodic nomad invaders on its head, as well as the relationship between the Qing Dynasty, themselves nomads, Central Asia, and the modern age.
Quite rightly, Millward’s chapter titles highlight Xinjiang's betweenness (“Between Islam and China”, “Between Empire and Nation”, “Between China and the USSR”, “Between China and the World”). Xinjiang is most often placed in a historical context subordinate to some greater power or civilization – whether its inseparability from China, conflating its Sufi-inspired Islam with the extremism of Osama Bin Laden, or claiming the ancient mummies found in its deserts are (gasp!) “blonde and blue-eyed” “Europeans”, even though Europe did not exist at the time. Asks Millward in a characteristic dash of humor, “Do mummies still have eyeballs?”
A History of Xinjiang is first and foremost a history book, and as such it may frighten some readers. Millward makes the experience considerably easier by bookending each section and chapter with clear summaries, though even a well-informed reader will become dizzy upon reading the constant backstabbing and intrigues of the Republican era as improbable alliances are formed, such as the Soviets supporting exiled White Russians fighting for the Republican-backed warlord Sheng Shicai, or the president-for-life of the second East Turkestan Republic turning in his own ministers to Sheng for a vice-chairmanship. But even then, the vast array of competing forces involved in Xinjiang only goes to support Millward's thesis that the history of Xinjiang is that of the interaction between many “peoples, cultures and polities, not of a single nation”.
Set as favorite
Bookmark
Email This
Comments
(8)
Hank Freid
written by Hank Freid , April 28, 2009
Good Post.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Gary Winnick
written by Gary Winnick , April 28, 2009
Nice Post.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
Inferiority Complex
written by Schopfergeist , August 12, 2007
It's called inferiority complex, and it's the root of anti-White sentiment.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
no more trash please
written by respectthiswebsite , July 20, 2007
Asia Sentinel should stop letting annoying people post comments. They ruin the site which otherwise displays in depth analysis of complex topics and journalistic integrity.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by nationalismsucks , July 20, 2007
i agree, this guy's arguments are totally false and baseless. They reveal not his disgust for colonialism, but his envy and jealousy of 'superior' forces. he refers to 'some japanese' rather than all, indicating his poignant sense of inferiority in the hierarchy.
Votes: +0
also he never mentions that south america should be 'liberated' from their spanish oppressors, along with n.america. Why?? Because he is simply jealous of American hegemonism, which he himself desires, rather than a humanist opposition to subjugation. report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by hmm , July 20, 2007
Taiwan is an illegal occupation as well, technically.
Votes: +0
report abuse
vote down
vote up
...
written by whataloser , July 20, 2007
this sounds like the sad ramblings of a petulant Asian who was afforded the luxury of a Western education but is probably sad that his spiteful personality earned him no friends, let alone a girlfriend. He thus interprets this rejection as an assault on his ethnicity, as opposed to his personality. Vicious cycle...
Votes: +0
This is a diatribe against white supremism rather than imperialism. It reinforces this person's personal vendetta rather than a principal he truly believes in. Xinjiang and Tibet would be returned to their rightful owners, as would parts of Inner Mongolia, if they were given the choice. All the Chinese would be kicked out of SE Asia and returned to the place they fled. It reflects the fact that Chinese nationalists believe they are the leaders of Asia and support the interests of all other Asian interests, a concept going back to the time of confucianism and bound feet.. report abuse
vote down
vote up
It\'s Time To Return The Counter Punch
written by Truly Asian , July 19, 2007
Instead of always reacting to the West on issues like Tibet, Xinjiang, Taiwan as if they are indeed separate entities endlessly & defensively, it's time China asserts herself more forcefully by taking the bull by the horn, so to speak, by giving back the same medicine they serve on us:the issues of illegal occupations of Asian territories of Australasia (Australia & New Zealand). It is high time that the whites be told of our abandonement of recognition of white settlements in these territories & henceforth declare that Australia & New Zealand are illegal entities & their very existence ultra virus the UN Charter on decolonisation. These whites should therefore be encouraged to sell out & ship back to Europe where they really belong. Some time down the line, this issues must be brought on to the table in some international forums for deliberations. Most nationalistic minded Asians, including Malaysians, Indonesians, some Japanese, Indians etc, let alone us Chinese, are simply just tolerating the present state of affairs until such time when the time is ripe to either buy out , or failing which evict by force, these illegal decendants of invaders of a bygone era who are enjoying the ill-gotten gains of their imperialistic conquering ancestors.
Votes: +1
The same goes for the North American continent & Hawaii (Canada & USA are also illegal entities) but they are too far for us Asians to poke our nose into.Hence, we shall leave them to the American natives to contemplate their actions. report abuse
vote down
vote up
|
| The Risk of Travel in AsiaOur Correspondent Full Story |
| Other Articles |
| Freedom of Expression Too Precious to Throw AwayThursday, 04 February 2010 | Alice Poon
In a free society, there will always be more than one single opinion. In a free society, it is accepted that everyone should have an equal right to express his/her opinion without fearing... Full Story |
| Previous posts: |
| From vultures in Delhi, to coups in Pakistan, a journalist's un-edited take on current events |